“Shakespeare without Othello, Lear, Macbeth and Hamlet would be all too much like Hamlet without the prince.”

I would not say that I was, these days, a ‘student’ of philosophy, although in my youth I was quite deeply involved with certain aspects of the British pragmatists.

I do not think that G. H. Hardy was talking nonsense when he insisted that the mathematician was discovering rather than creating, nor was it wholly nonsense for Kepler to exult that he was thinking God’s thoughts after him.

Whether you choose a vacation or a spouse, a party or a candidate, a cause to contribute to or a creed to live by – think!

A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise.

To understand the nature of the people one must be a prince, and to understand the nature of the prince, one must be of the people.

For among other evils caused by being disarmed, it renders you contemptible; which is one of those disgraceful things which a prince must guard against.

And she needs no prince or knight to save her, because her might is enough to tame dragons.

The need for love hallucinates a prince or princess. The oasis complex is never a complete delusion: the man in the desert does see something on the horizon. It is just that the palms have withered, the well is dry, and the place is infected with locusts.

I can’t help but think that it was on purpose, to attract the prince’s affections. No matter what I do, I’ll still have the fate of a girl who just keeps getting hurt, wondering if she can be happy in this pointless, one man show?

Cinderella’s glass shoe was the perfect size…. so why did it slip off as she ran? It must have been to attract the attention of Prince Charming. I don’t see any other explanation.

Ruled by the prince of darkness and the master of deception who wears many disguises and has many aliases.