I think editors have to come out of a certain kind of community.
BILL JOYYou can’t prove anything about a program written in C or FORTRAN. It’s really just Peek and Poke with some syntactic sugar.
More Bill Joy Quotes
-
-
I think multiple levels of undo would be wonderful, too.
BILL JOY -
I just don’t like to lose what’s in the window.
BILL JOY -
The standard definition of AI is that which we don’t understand.
BILL JOY -
Today scientists, technologists, businessmen, engineers don’t have any personal responsibility for the consequences of their actions.
BILL JOY -
And once an intelligent robot exists, it is only a small step to a robot species – to an intelligent robot that can make evolved copies of itself.
BILL JOY -
There are a couple of people in the world who can really program in C or FØRTRAN. They write more code in less time than it takes for other programmers. Most programmers aren’t that good.
BILL JOY -
The best way to do research is to make a radical assumption and then assume it’s true. For me, I use the assumption that object oriented programming is the way to go.
BILL JOY -
That lack of programmability is probably what ultimately will doom vi. It can’t extend its domain.
BILL JOY -
I think one of the interesting things is that vi is really a mode-based editor.
BILL JOY -
Although humankind inherently “desires to know”, if open access to, and unlimited development of, knowledge henceforth puts us all in clear danger of extinction, then common sense demands that we re-examine our reverence for knowledge.
BILL JOY -
The problem is that those few programmers who crank out code aren’t interested in maintaining it.
BILL JOY -
What’s your personal computer, anyways? Your personal computer should be something that’s always on your person.
BILL JOY -
The next step after cheap is free, and after free is disposable.
BILL JOY -
You can’t prove anything about a program written in C or FORTRAN. It’s really just Peek and Poke with some syntactic sugar.
BILL JOY -
Given the incredible power of these new technologies, shouldn’t we be asking how we can best coexist with them? And if our own extinction is a likely, or even possible, outcome of our technological development, shouldn’t we proceed with great caution?
BILL JOY