“It seems from my unique vantage point as both scientist and editor of JSE that substantial evidence exists of “something going on”.”

I propose a worldview that offers a way out of the hate and fear-driven violence engulfing the planet.

Consciousness creates reality.

Most scientists never look at UFO evidence, which leads to their conclusion that there is no evidence.

Playing the game is far more satisfying than reading the rules.

Cut through the ridicule and search for factual information in most of the skeptical commentary and one is usually left with nothing. This is not surprising. After all, how can one rationally object to a call for scientific examination of evidence? Be skeptical of the skeptics.

I offer a genuine insight into how you can, and should, be a rational, science-believing human being and at the same time know that you are also an immortal spiritual being, a spark of God.

You should never rely on interviews with musicians as being factual.

I think one of the interesting things is that vi is really a mode-based editor.

The Denver Post has actually hired an editor to promote pot.

It’s very hard to stand up to the government which is saying that publication will threaten national security. People don’t seem to realize that reporters and editors know something about national security and care deeply about it.

Sure, some journalists use anonymous sources just because they’re lazy, and I think editors ought to insist on more precise identification even if they remain anonymous.

In college, I was an editor on the student daily… To the extent that I noticed the existence of crew at all, I saw only what appeared to be big-boned acolytes who rose at dawn.

If you dared to put your opinion into a factual piece, your editors said, “You can’t do this. Write an op-ed.”

Rides in the whirlwind and directs the storm.