“Even logical positivists are capable of love.”

We say that a sentence is factually significant to any given person, if, and only if, he knows how to verify the proposition which it purports to express.

If the assertion that there is a god is nonsensical, then the atheist’s assertion that there is no god is equally nonsensical, since it is only a significant proposition that can be significantly contradicted.

Why should you mind being wrong if someone can show you that you are?

It seems that I have spent my entire life trying to make life more rational and that it was all wasted effort.

I saw a Divine Being. I’m afraid I’m going to have to revise all my various books and opinions.

The ground for taking ignorance to be restrictive of freedom is that it causes people to make choices which they would not have made if they had seen what the realization of their choices involved.

But if science may be said to be blind without philosophy, it is true also that philosophy is virtually empty without science.

No morality can be founded on authority, even if the authority were divine.

There is philosophy, which is about conceptual analysis – about the meaning of what we say – and there is all of this … all of life.

It appears, then, that ethics, as a branch of knowledge, is nothing more than a department of psychologyand sociology.

The traditional disputes of philosophers are, for the most part, as unwarranted as they are unfruitful.

We shall maintain that no statement which refers to a ‘reality’transcending the limits of all possible sense- experience can possibly have any literal significance.

I see philosophy as a fairly abstract activity, as concerned mainly with the analysis of criticism and concepts, and of course most usefully of scientific concepts.

Theism is so confused and the sentences in which “God” appears so incoherent and so incapable of verifiability or falsifiability that to speak of belief or unbelief, faith or unfaith, is logically impossible.

Bertrand Russell would not have wished to be called a saint of any description; but he was a great and good man.

I take it, therefore, to be a fact, that one’s existence ends with death. I think it possible to show how this fact can be emotionally acceptable.

It is all about numbers. It is all about sequence. It’s the mathematical logic of being alive.

If you’re rational and logical, they argue their case rationally and logically. If you’re loyal and faithful, they turn those against you.

To get at the meaning of a statement the logical positivist asks, “What would the world be like if it were true?”

But the next quite logical step after the reals, namely the introduction of infinitesimals, has simply been omitted.

To me, acting is the most logical way for people’s neuroses to manifest themselves, in this great need we all have to express ourselves.

To me, acting is the most logical way for people’s neuroses to manifest themselves, in this great need we all have to express ourselves.

Theism is so confused and the sentences in which “God” appears so incoherent and so incapable of verifiability or falsifiability that to speak of belief or unbelief, faith or unfaith, is logically impossible.

This view of the infinite, which I consider to be the sole correct one, is held by only a few. While possibly I am the very first in history to take this position so explicitly, with all of its logical consequences, I know for sure that I shall not be the last!